Putin claimed his Great Game prize at a weekend meeting with Turkmenistan President Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov and Kazakhstan Presdient Nursultan Nazarbayev.
Cheney had personally courted Kazakh President Nazarbayev in a bid to win support for the Trans-Caspian pipeline.Â And the US had made similar overtures to Turkmenistan President Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov after the sudden death of his predecessor, Saparmurat Niyazov, in December 2006.
Kazakh President Nazarbayev had been slated to attend an energy summit of ex-Soviet bloc leaders meeting in Poland to discuss pipeline projects designed to bypass Russia.
Instead of bypassing Russia, Nazarbayev bypassed Cheney.
This is an enormous victory for Putin in the increasingly intense Great Power rivalry between Russia and the United States.
Turkmen President Berdymukhamedov, seemingly eager to forestall an inevitable US-led smear campaign against his authoritarian regime, has held out hope that the Russian pipeline agreement does not preclude alternatives, including the Trans-Caspian pipeline:
Turkmen ambassador to Austria Esen Aydogdyev told the Viennese daily Der Standard that ‘Turkmenistan has enough gas to export it in all directions; the project involving a trans-Caspian pipeline remains an option. The West doesn’t need to have any worries.’
Austrian oil and gas company OMV AG plays a leading role in the consortium currently planning the Nabucco natural gas pipeline and recently confirmed its commitment to the project.
Nevertheless, officials in the US and Russia appear to read the situation differently.
Russian Industry and Energy Minister Viktor Khristenko, clearly gloating, suggested that Cheney’s pipeline is now dead:
“In my view, technological, legal, and environmental risks that are involved in the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline project make it impossible to find an investor for it, unless it is viewed as a purely political project and unless it does not matter what this pipe will pump,” Khristenko told journalists in Turkmenbashi on Saturday.
Khristenko’s American counterpart, US Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, appears to view the outcome as a significant setback for US efforts to help break European dependence on Russia.
U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said Monday that a deal to pipe gas from Turkmenistan to customers in the West via Russia was bad for Europe.
Speaking at a press conference on the sidelines of an International Energy Agency meeting here, Bodman said: “It would not be good for Europe. It concentrates more natural gas to one supplier.”
Implications for Iran
Putin’s Caspian delight may have significant implications for US policy toward Iran.Â Cheney had been hoping to use the Trans-Caspian Pipeline, along with the Baku-Tiblis-Ceyhan oil and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzerum gas pipelines, to bypass Iran and Russia.Â The gas would eventually flow to Europe through the NABUCCO pipeline.
Now, Cheney will arguably be forced to choose between “the lesser of two evils.”
From the perspective of Great Power politics, there is no question: Cheney will try to reconstruct an alliance with Iran.
The only question now may be how Cheney will rebuild ties between the US and Iran: diplomacy or regime change.Â For the vice president, mere “containment” of Iran is no longer an option.Â Cheney will not be likely leave office without an alliance with Iran.
One challenge, among several, is to pry Iran away from Russia.
Gvosdev argued that Europe needed Iranian gas for the NABUCCO pipeline:
[T]here is only so much time before Europeans will decide that Iran, which has the worldâ€™s second largest reserves of natural gas, is a critical part of ensuring their energy security. So far, the United States has been largely successful in convincing Europeans to delay proposed investments in Iranâ€™s natural gas sector and has expressed strong disapproval of plans to connect Iran to the so-called NABUCCO pipeline (designed to bring Caspian gas via Turkey to Europe).
But NABUCCO has limits. Many Europeans are skeptical that there is enough Caspian gas to really make a difference for their consumption… In the end, I was told, for NABUCCO to make sense, it will have to include gas from Iran.
This means that sooner or later Europeâ€™s ability to give Washington support on isolating Iran will give way to its own needs for energy….
[W]as this is a case of advising, “Whatever you do, do it quickly”â€”meaning that if the United States were to pursue forcible regime change the preference would be to do it sooner?… [B]y 2011 or 2013, large-scale European investment in Iran will begin no matter whether it is still the Islamic Republic or some other form of government…
Right Zionists like Michael Ledeen were once champions of engagement with Iran.Â That idea seems to have collapsed after 1991.
Will Right Zionists revert to their earlier support for an opening with Iran?Â Or is Russia the “lesser of two evils” for Right Zionists, especially in light of Israeli interests in Turkmenistan and Iranian support for Hezbollah and Hamas?
Or, will Cheney and Right Zionists constitute a united front toward regime change in Iran?