{"id":201,"date":"2006-12-04T09:57:55","date_gmt":"2006-12-04T14:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/?p=201"},"modified":"2007-02-27T22:05:03","modified_gmt":"2007-02-28T03:05:03","slug":"there-goes-the-neighborhood","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/?p=201","title":{"rendered":"There Goes the Neighborhood"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=windows-1252\" \/><title>When Democrats look around for a<\/title>When Democrats look around for a way to criticize the Bush administration on  the war in Iraq without taking a stand on some of the tougher political issues  involved, they have often adopted a page from the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/archives.cnn.com\/2002\/ALLPOLITICS\/08\/25\/iraq.baker\/\"> standard Right Arabist playbook<\/a>: bring in Iraq&#8217;s neighbors.<\/p>\n<p>Outgoing UN General Secretary Kofi Annan has recently <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.un.org\/apps\/news\/story.asp?NewsID=20757&#038;Cr=iraq&#038;Cr1=\"> adopted and promoted the idea<\/a> of an international conference.The idea of  dialogue seems so innocuous that liberals in the US might have been a bit  surprised to learn that several Iraq politicians have <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/ap\/2006\/12\/03\/africa\/ME_GEN_Iraq_International_Conference.php\"> rejected the idea<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;latent&#8221; meaning of the international conference idea is rendered clear  by the partisan responses emerging in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>The key political <em>opponents<\/em> of the international conference are Shiite  leaders, including SCIRI&#8217;s <font id=\"text\">Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim<\/font> and&#8211;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/news\/nationworld\/chi-0612030361dec03,1,5071488.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed\">allegedly<\/a>&#8211;Iraq&#8217;s  Shiite Prime Minister <font id=\"text\">Nouri al-Maliki<\/font>. They are joined by  leading Kurdish figures, including Iraqi President Jalal Talabani and Foreign  Minister Hoshyar Zebari.<\/p>\n<p>These political forces represent the &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/?p=200\">80  percent solution<\/a>&#8221; that originally animated Right Zionist policy in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>The International Conference represents one element in a long-term Right  Arabist push back against the 80 percent solution.<\/p>\n<p>Hence, it <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.arabmonitor.info\/news\/dettaglio.php?idnews=16681\u00e2\u0152\u00a9=en\"> has won the support of Iyad Allawi<\/a>&#8211;the ex-Baathist long favored by Bush  administration Right Arabists and the figure <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.chinadaily.com.cn\/english\/doc\/2004-05\/29\/content_334751.htm\"> appointed as first Iraqi Prime Minister<\/a> by the US and U.N. envoy Lakhdar  Brahimi&#8211;along with Saudi Arabia and Jordan.<\/p>\n<p>These Iraqi battle lines have been at the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zmag.org\/content\/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10185\"> core of US policy<\/a> since the end of Operation Desert Storm.<\/p>\n<p>The central question right now is balance of power within the Bush  administration regarding these competing forces.<\/p>\n<p>How do you read the tea leaves?<\/p>\n<p>Where does Iran fit in all this?<\/p>\n<p>Annan and James Baker endorse a dialogue that includes not only Saudis and  Jordanians, but also Iran and Syria. Does an international conference represent  a tilt <em>toward<\/em> Iran? Or an instrument designed to <em>contain<\/em> Iran?<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, does the 80 percent solution represent a tilt <em>toward<\/em> Iran?  Or is it a major step toward a US policy of <em>regime change<\/em> in Iran?<\/p>\n<p>What does it mean that Hakim rejects the international conference and  presumably welcomes the 80 percent solution?<\/p>\n<p>Does Hakim represent a tilt toward the incumbent Iranian regime? Or does  Hakim serve Sistani and represent an in independent Iraqi Shiite position that  shifts the center of gravity from away from the Iranian city of Qom and toward  the Iraqi city of Najaf?<\/p>\n<p>[Update: a bunch of sources&#8211;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.juancole.com\/2006\/12\/talabani-hakim-reject-intl-conference.html#comments\">Informed  Comment<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/arablinks.blogspot.com\/2006\/12\/azzaman-says-some-iraqi-opponents-of.html\"> Missing Links<\/a>, and\u00c2\u00a0Robert Dreyfuss at <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tompaine.com\/articles\/2006\/12\/04\/bushs_meeting_with_a_murderer.php\"> TomPaine.com<\/a>&#8211;are all reporting that another prominent ex-Baathist, Saleh  Mutlaq, is joining Iyad Allawi in supporting Annan&#8217;s international conference.<\/p>\n<p>No surprise here.\u00c2\u00a0 The bigger news is that all three sources are also saying  that Mutlaq (also Salih al-Mutlak) and Moqtada al-Sadr have agreed to join  together in a new nationalist parliamentary front on the basis of common  opposition to the US military occupation and to the breakup of Iraq into  relatively autonomous regions with control of new oil field development.\u00c2\u00a0 All of  the sectarian violence has functioned to shift the axis from an <em>anti-US<\/em>  nationalist insurgency toward a sectarian axis that pits Shiiites and Sunnis  against each other.\u00c2\u00a0 Sadr and Mutlak represent an effort to restore the  nationalist, anti-occupation axis.<br \/>\nFinally, a word on Robert Dreyfuss.\u00c2\u00a0 Notwithstanding his impressive  &#8220;progressive&#8221; credentials (<em>The Nation<\/em>, <em>Mother Jones<\/em>, <em>The  American Prospect<\/em>), I am more convinced than  ever that his writing about the war in Iraq is fundamentally flawed because it <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.zmag.org\/content\/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10185\"> adopts the perspective of Right Arabist imperialists<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In the past, he has articulated what appeared to be a particularly &#8220;amoral&#8221;  perspective on the regime of Saddam Hussein, as when he celebrated the idea that  the US would &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/robertdreyfuss.com\/blog\/2006\/03\/usbaath_talks_bring_back_the_b.html\">Bring  Back the Baath<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, however, he adopts a <em>shrill<\/em> and <em>deeply moralistic<\/em> tone as  the Bush administration once again flirts with Iraqi Shiites, describing the  upcoming Washington\u00c2\u00a0 visit of Abdel Aziz al-Hakim as &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.tompaine.com\/articles\/2006\/12\/04\/bushs_meeting_with_a_murderer.php\">Bush&#8217;s  Meeting with a Murderer<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Left can <em>either<\/em> be moralistic and idealistic about foreign policy <em>or<\/em> it can be cynical, amoralistic and &#8220;realistic&#8221; about foreign policy.\u00c2\u00a0  But to deploy these discourses so <em>unevenly<\/em>, however, smacks of rank  hypocrisy.\u00c2\u00a0 Dreyfuss has become nothing more than a pawn for one side of an  intra-imperialist factional game.]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When Democrats look around for aWhen Democrats look around for a way to criticize the Bush administration on the war in Iraq without taking a stand on some of the tougher political issues involved, they have often adopted a page from the standard Right Arabist playbook: bring in Iraq&#8217;s neighbors. Outgoing UN General Secretary Kofi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6,3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}