{"id":270,"date":"2007-04-04T06:12:08","date_gmt":"2007-04-04T11:12:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/?p=270"},"modified":"2007-04-05T06:05:16","modified_gmt":"2007-04-05T11:05:16","slug":"the-us-russian-war-in-iraq","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/?p=270","title":{"rendered":"The US-Russian War in Iraq"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><meta http-equiv=\"Content-Language\" content=\"en-us\" \/> <meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=windows-1252\" \/><title>Was the US invasion of Iraq was<\/title>Was the US invasion of Iraq was an opening salvo in a US-Russian war?<\/p>\n<p>According to such a scenario, the &#8220;crisis&#8221; that led some in the Bush  administration to press for an invasion of Iraq was not WMDs, a terror threat,  domestic repression of Shiites and Kurds, etc.\u00c2\u00a0 The crisis came when Saddam  began to slip out of his &#8220;sanctions&#8221; cage by shacking up in 1997 with Russian  oil giant, Lukoil, for an agreement for the development of the giant West Qurna  field.<\/p>\n<p>So, have those most concerned to keep Iraq from Russia managed to do so?<\/p>\n<p>Not yet.<\/p>\n<p>Lukoil&#8211;and its American partner, ConocoPhillips, which owns a minority share  in Lukoil&#8211;are still eager to try to get back in the game.<\/p>\n<p>An April 2 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/companyNewsAndPR\/idUSL0234438320070402\"> Reuters<\/a> report details a campaign by Lukoil and the Russian foreign ministry  to insure that Lukoil doesn&#8217;t get shut out:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Russia&#8217;s top oil producer LUKOIL&#8230; signed a partnership deal with the  \tforeign ministry on Monday and said it counted on its support as it prepares  \tfor talks to revive a giant oil deal in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>LUKOIL and the ministry said in a statement that the deal, the first of its  \tkind in Russia, aims to support LUKOIL&#8217;s projects abroad, defend the firm&#8217;s  \tinterests by diplomatic means and facilitate the firm&#8217;s meetings abroad&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Our company is entering new regions, including politically unstable  \tregions. We will especially need support of the ministry in Iraq,&#8221; Interfax  \tnews agency quoted LUKOIL chief executive Vagit Alekperov as saying at a  \tsigning ceremony which was closed to reporters from foreign media  \torganisations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Nevertheless, Lukoil may have reason to worry that the proposed Iraqi oil  legislation will leave the Russians out in the cold.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the chatter in the US has been about the &#8220;scandal&#8221; of proposed  &#8220;production sharing agreements&#8221; in the hydrocarbons law.\u00c2\u00a0 These are said to  offer up the prospect of a massive money grab by the Oil Majors by coming very  close to &#8220;privatizing&#8221; Iraqi oil.<\/p>\n<p>That gets folks in the US all excited about the ways in which the US invasion  of Iraq was all about the spread of neo-liberal market ideology.<\/p>\n<p>When the so-called &#8220;Left&#8221; thinks about these issues, it misses the Great  Power battle and sees only a struggle between the forces of statist justice and  market greed.\u00c2\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thenation.com\/docprint.mhtml?i=20070319&#038;s=parenti\">Christian  Parenti<\/a>, for example, deserves props for <em>noticing<\/em> that the new Iraqi  oil law is not all about privatization.\u00c2\u00a0 He even mentions that the Lukoil  deal will be restructured.\u00c2\u00a0 But he appears to be <em>comforted<\/em> rather  than alarmed by the implications:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Nor does the proposed oil law simply serve Iraq up on a plate to the oil  \tgiants. One London-based oil analyst who expected a more decentralized and  \tfree-market law called it &#8220;bloody confused.&#8221; On key questions of foreign  \tinvestment and regional decentralization versus centralized control, the law  \tis vague but <strong>not all bad<\/strong>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The draft law will leave ownership of the oil in state hands<\/strong>&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the new law does not mention PSAs and it stipulates that firms  \twill have to negotiate on a field-by-field basis.<\/p>\n<p>The law will restructure the oil industry in other important ways: It  \twill appoint a Federal Oil and Gas Council led by the prime minister to  \toversee all future contracts as well as review existing deals. Those  \tagreements include the five contracts signed by the Kurdish Regional  \tGovernment and six outstanding PSAs signed between Saddam Hussein and a mix  \tof companies&#8211;most notably Lukoil of Russia, Total of France, the China  \tNational Petroleum Corporation and Italy&#8217;s Eni.<\/p>\n<p>A single state-owned Iraqi National Oil Company will be reconstituted  \tunder central government control.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So close.\u00c2\u00a0 And, yet, so far.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;scandal&#8221; may not be American market ideology in Iraq.\u00c2\u00a0  The real scandal may be the US move to <em>nationalize<\/em> some key  elements of the Iraqi oil industry in an effort to thwart Russian (and French)  ambitions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/construction.ecnext.com\/coms2\/plattsbrowse_PN_\">Platts  Oilgram News<\/a> offered up this analysis of the Iraqi hydrocarbons law (Faleh  al-Khayat, &#8220;New Iraqi oil law to open upstream sector; Gives powers to  rejuvenated national company,&#8221; March 6, 2007):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The final draft of Iraq&#8217;s long-awaited oil and gas law opens up the  \tcountry&#8217;s prized upstream sector to private, local and foreign investors for  \tthe first time since the 1970s, but appears to give more powers to a revived  \tnational oil company to manage current producing fields and giant  \tundeveloped discoveries.<\/p>\n<p>Platts has obtained the final draft of the law in Arabic, dated February 15  \tand approved by the Council of Ministers February 26, along with annexes  \tclassifying the oil fields and blocks to be opened up&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The law, now awaiting approval by parliament, re-establishes the Iraqi  \tNational Oil Company (INOC), which was disbanded in 1987&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>INOC will operate Iraq&#8217;s producing fields, numbering 27, and, significantly,  \tthe partially developed fields of Majnoon, Halfaya, Nahr BinUma, Suba and  \tLuhais, Tuba, and the whole of the giant West Qurna field. The ousted regime  \tof Saddam Husssein had given France&#8217;s Total the right to negotiate  \texclusively a production sharing contract for the giant fields of Majnoon  \tand Nahr Bin Umar. Saddam&#8217;s government also signed in 1997 an agreement with  \ta Lukoil-led consortium to develop the West Qurna field, but the agreement  \twas later terminated.<\/p>\n<p>The inclusion of these fields under INOC&#8217;s direct responsibility would  \texclude foreign companies from any production sharing role and limit them to  \tservice or management contracts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>All of which amounts to saying that the Russians may get back into Iraq via  the West Qurna field, but it will have to operate under the terms of the  national oil company under the political control of the Iraqi government.\u00c2\u00a0  The same goes for France which would <em>lose<\/em> its &#8220;production sharing  contract&#8221; agreed with Saddam Hussein&#8217;s government.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the Russian press seems to agree that the terms of Iraqi hydrocarbons  law are designed to hurt Russian interests.\u00c2\u00a0 Kommersant published a story,  &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.kommersant.com\/p-10251\/r_529\/Field_Iraq_LUKOIL\/\">Lukoil to  Be Stripped Off A Field In Iraq<\/a>&#8220;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Russia\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s oil blockbuster, LUKOIL, could be stripped off a field in Iraq,  \tlentar.ru reported. The government of that country has presented to  \tparliament a bill implying revision of crude oil agreements concluded in  \ttime of Saddam Hussein.<\/p>\n<p>If passed, the bill advocated by today\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s government of Iraq will hit two  \tcompanies of Russia. One of them is LUKOIL that is developing the West  \tQurna-2 field, the second is Stroitransgaz that has a geological exploration  \tcontract for the fourth block of the West Desert, Vremia Novostei reported.<\/p>\n<p>Under the bill that lobbies the U.S. interests, 51 fields and 65 exploration  \tblocks will be split into four categories. The first one will include 27  \tfields that are currently developed, while the second category will specify  \tthe fields with proven reserves located near the fields of the first  \tcategory. The remaining fields will form the third category and the forth  \tcategory will be represented by exploration blocks.<\/p>\n<p>Predictably, the fields of the first two categories, including West Qurna-2,  \twill pass under control of the national oil company of Iraq that is being  \tcreated now.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If the US invasion of Iraq was part of a Great Power battle with Russia, then  the key decision on the Iraqi hydrocarbons law may have been to renationalize  those Iraqi oil fields that were set to fall into the hands of Russia and  France.<\/p>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Was the US invasion of Iraq wasWas the US invasion of Iraq was an opening salvo in a US-Russian war? According to such a scenario, the &#8220;crisis&#8221; that led some in the Bush administration to press for an invasion of Iraq was not WMDs, a terror threat, domestic repression of Shiites and Kurds, etc.\u00c2\u00a0 The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[25,3,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=270"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/270\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=270"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=270"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/profcutler.com\/wordpress_blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=270"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}